
That observation has always seemed pretty much irrefutable to me, though it doesn't mean that the "things themselves," which we only know from our perceptions, and our ideas about them, don't actually "exist." In other words, the fact that we know about things only through the sensations that we experience, doesn't mean that the things we confront through our perceptions are illusions; they may, in fact, completely conform (in "reality") to the perceptions we have. The Wikipedia article describes a refutation of Berkeley's theory, by Samuel Johnson, as follows: "Dr. Samuel Johnson kicked a heavy stone and exclaimed, 'I refute it thus!'"
Seen from the perspective of the two-worlds hypothesis, the world of Nature, to which Johnson's stone belongs, is perhaps a different kind of reality from the reality of the world we create ourselves. In our world, the heavy stones we kick are not immovable or immutable, though our "perceptions" may suggest they are.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment!